Autonomous control
KoPilot
Closed-loop control of the process, minute by minute, with no human at the panel.
Energy per tonne and yield stop depending on who is on shift, and the best night your plant has ever run becomes every night.
How it works
What it takes over from
- Setpoints tuned by hand, differently on every shift
- Comfort margins nobody has revisited
Pays for itself by
Energy per tonne, yield, and consistency that no longer depend on who is on shift.
The number a buyer checks: Energy cost per unit of output, and output variance between shifts.
Proof
- 2×
- Winner, Autonomous Greenhouse Challenge 2018 and 2022, a live crop each time
- 17%
- Higher net profit than the expert growers 2018 competition, with 6% higher yield
- 19.5%
- Yield increase on cucumber 29.7 against 24.9 kg/m² in the growers' own zone
- 17%
- Energy savings lower electricity cost per unit, same lights in both zones
KoPilot has been tested in international competition and in commercial greenhouses. In 2018, the technology behind it was the only AI entry to beat the expert growers on both yield and net profit. KoPilot does more than recommend a climate strategy. It makes the control decisions and applies them, day and night.
What KoPilot does
KoPilot continuously adjusts process setpoints to keep operations close to the desired operating point. It reads real-time plant data, determines the appropriate setpoints, and sends those setpoints back to the existing control system.
Instead of waiting for an operator to review conditions and make the next adjustment, KoPilot responds continuously as conditions change.
Physics-informed control
KoPilot combines process data with models of how the physical system behaves, so a control decision stays within what the equipment can actually do rather than only within patterns seen in historical data.
- How quickly equipment can heat or cool
- A dryer cannot heat faster than its mass allows, so the model never proposes it.
- How humidity responds to ventilation
- Opening a vent changes humidity and temperature together, and the model knows by how much.
- How one control action affects conditions later
- A move that looks good this minute is rejected when it costs more over the next four hours.
Historical data remains useful, but autonomous control also has to behave sensibly when the process enters conditions it has rarely seen before.
Start with the right foundation
Closed-loop control is not appropriate for every process on day one.
It depends on the quality and coverage of existing instrumentation, the reliability of the underlying control system, how well the process can be modeled, the operating constraints that must be respected, and whether a supervised trial can be run safely before autonomous operation.
Most customers start with Maintenance Management or DataPilot, and add Predix before moving to closed-loop control. Those products create the data, operational history and process understanding needed to make autonomous control more reliable.
Tell us about your process and we can assess where autonomous control is practical, what should come first, and how a supervised deployment could be structured.
Where this sits
You can start with Maintenance Management or with DataPilot. Predix needs both.
-
Start here
Maintenance Management
Work orders, preventive maintenance, asset records and spare parts, on the phone your technicians already carry.
-
Start here
DataPilot
Every signal the plant produces, in one place, live and historical.
-
AI insights
Predix
Reports that say what changed and what to do next, and early warning of a failing machine.
-
Autonomous control
KoPilot
Closed-loop control of the process, minute by minute, with no human at the panel.
See Koidra on your own plant data
Bring a week of readings from one line. We will show you what the platform sees, what it would have flagged, and what it would have scheduled.
Book a demo